Jama Software Vs Visure
Visure, the most affordable All-in-One Enterprise ALM Tool to manage requirements, risk, tests and traceability.
When it comes to requirements management tools, Visure Solutions and Jama Software are two of the most popular options on the market. While both offer similar features, there are some key differences between the two that may make one a better fit for your organization’s specific needs.
Visure Solutions is known for its customizable templates, built-in risk management capabilities, and end-to-end traceability, while Jama Software is known for its collaboration features and ease of use.
In this comprehensive comparison, we will dive deeper into the similarities and differences between Visure Solutions and Jama Software to help you make an informed decision about which tool is best for your requirements management and product development needs.
Requirements Management
One major advantage of Visure over Jama is its flexibility and customization options. Visure allows users to define their own requirement types, attributes, and relationships, as well as create custom templates and workflows. This means that organizations can tailor the tool to their specific needs and processes, rather than being constrained by predefined structures and workflows.
Another advantage of Visure is its traceability and impact analysis features. Visure allows users to trace requirements across the entire product lifecycle, from inception to retirement, and to visualize the relationships and dependencies between requirements. This enables better decision-making and helps ensure that changes to requirements are properly evaluated for their impact on the rest of the product.
Finally, Visure has a strong focus on collaboration and communication, with features such as real-time commenting, task assignments, and email notifications. This makes it easy for teams to stay connected and informed throughout the requirements management process, which is particularly important in distributed or remote work environments.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Store source document from interviews, workshops, and observation in a database, as OLE objects. | |
OLE objects supported
|
Storing and managing the identification of stakeholders through the integration with LDAP, NT and Active Directory, and define their roles and responsibilities. | | |
Associate source documents with requirements. | | |
Import requirements from multiple source documents (Word & Excel) |
MS Word and Excel plugins
|
Limited.
|
Word Import/Synchronization Managing the replacement or updating requirements by importing from MS Excel, MS Word or IBM Rational DOORS. | |
Limited Import of object types e.g. tests, risks, etc. No import of traceability
|
Excel Import/Synchronization Managing the replacement or updating requirements by importing from MS Excel, MS Word or IBM Rational DOORS. | |
Limited Import of object types e.g. tests, risks, etc. No import of traceability
|
Word Export with customer templates | | |
Excel Export | | |
Import requirements from IBM Rational DOORS | | |
Managing the replacement or updating requirements by importing from MS Excel, MS Word or IBM Rational DOORS. | | |
Tracing requirements and generating trace reports | |
Reporting is very limited in Jama
|
Import requirements from another project for re-use | | |
Manually create requirements through customizable templates | |
Limited to one template per item type
|
Create a requirements structure | | |
Create a graphical representation of the requirements structureAerospace: DO-178C and DO-254Railway: CENELEC EN50128 ISO 27Banking & Finance: CMMI, Agile, SpicePharma: GAMP5 | |
Limited to item types, not documents
|
Restrict the relationships based on the traceability policy | |
Limited to item types, not documents
|
Traceability between projects | | |
Graphical representation of link policy between projects | | |
Available structure templates available for ISO 26262, DO-178C/DO-254, IEC 62304, FMEA, IEC 61508 and other standards | |
Limited templates available
|
Links creation by right-clicking action and drag and drop | |
Limited
|
Display links in Traceability Matrix | | |
Allow exporting the traceability matrix to MS Excel | |
Limited reporting capabilities
|
Support filtering the traceability matrix by missing links | | |
Navigate to source and target element from the traceability matrix | | |
Maintain a link between a requirement and its source document | | |
Browse and search requirements throughout the whole project | | |
Select and display requirements in multiple views based on filters and view types: | | |
- Document-like view | | |
- Excel-like view | | |
- Traceability tree view | | |
- Kanban view | | |
- Traceability diagram view | | |
Save organization of requirements into views that can be shared with other users | | |
Multiple Export formats (Word, Excel, PDF, HTML, etc.) | |
Limited reporting capabilities
|
Generation of reports in batch mode | | |
Storing and managing user defined or tool provided elicitation checklists |
Checklists available for formal reviews for different industries
|
No out-of-the-box checklists for reviews
|
Requirements Analysis
Firstly, Visure offers a more comprehensive set of requirements management features that allow for a more efficient and structured analysis of requirements. With Visure, users can create and manage requirements in a variety of formats, including use cases, user stories, and test cases. The tool also provides advanced traceability capabilities, allowing users to easily track requirements and their related artifacts throughout the development process.
Secondly, Visure’s user interface is designed to be more intuitive and user-friendly compared to Jama. With Visure, users can easily customize the tool to fit their specific needs and workflows. This helps to streamline the requirements analysis process and reduce the time and effort required to manage requirements.
Lastly, Visure has a strong focus on compliance and regulatory requirements, which is particularly important for industries such as aerospace, defense, and healthcare. The tool provides advanced features to support compliance with regulations such as DO-178, ISO 26262, and FDA 21 CFR Part 11. This makes Visure a more suitable option for organizations that need to comply with complex regulatory frameworks.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Importing and exporting to and from modeling tools such as Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect | | |
Storing and displaying context diagrams, conceptual domain models, and other high-level models (e.g. Goal models, Object models, Task models) | |
Only images can be saved, no OLE objects can be displayed
|
Supporting an interface to a terminology(glossary) or domain knowledge | | |
Storing and managing the information and rationale for resolved results | | |
Manually insert a new requirement with automatic creation of links to the original requirement | | |
Definition of acceptance test description and results document | | |
Link between requirement and test specifications | | |
Test documents status follow-up (not defined, defined, not realized, passed, failed) | | |
Automatic check of poor quality of requirements (Ambiguities, Inconsistencies, etc.) | | |
Requirements Quality Metrics & Analyzer |
Customizable semantic analysis
| |
Requirements Verification, Validation & Testing
Visure and Jama are both capable tools for requirements verification, validation, and testing. However, there are a few key areas where Visure excels compared to Jama.
Firstly, Visure provides a more comprehensive set of testing features that support the entire testing lifecycle. With Visure, users can create and manage test cases, execute tests, and track test results. The tool also provides advanced reporting and analysis features that allow users to easily identify and resolve issues in the testing process.
Secondly, Visure’s traceability capabilities are more robust compared to Jama, which is essential for requirements verification and validation. Visure’s advanced traceability features allow users to easily track the relationship between requirements, tests, and defects, ensuring that all requirements are adequately tested and verified.
Lastly, Visure offers more advanced integration capabilities, which is essential for organizations that use multiple tools for requirements verification, validation, and testing. Visure can easily integrate with a variety of testing tools, including JUnit, Selenium, and HP Quality Center, allowing users to seamlessly transition between different tools and workflows.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Consistency check for isolated items (requirement or function), lack of attributes, un-allocated requirements, un-justified functions etc .. |
Customizable semantic analysis
| |
Means to check that requirements have been met, how, when | | |
Link between requirement and associated documents (tests, specifications, etc.) | | |
Links from requirements to test steps | | |
Identification of failed requirements based on traceability to failed steps | | |
Custom Test Procedures/Test Case/Test Plan reports | | |
Custom Test Session Summary reports | | |
Requirements coverage verification (logical check, conformity matrices (allocated to, responding to, satisfied by, verified by, compliant with, etc.)) | | |
Customize, display and follow-up requirements’ status (defined, draft, validated) | | |
Validation process support (workflow) |
Yes. Customizable
|
Yes, but not Customizable.
|
Create and store customizable views | | |
Accessing to large numbers of stakeholders and users for review and comment of requirements | | |
Providing user group security for each requirement (e.g., access, read only, read-write) | | |
Managing user comments and review edit. | | |
Storing and managing discussions linked to each specific requirement | | |
Maintaining history of all changes for each requirement | | |
Storing and managing the review and inspection results (e.g., how it was done and who was responsible) | | |
Generating exception reports on user requirements that do not have validation plan cases and validation plan cases that are not linked to user requirements | | |
Supporting review and inspection of validation plans and procedures | | |
Providing standard format for interfacing to issue tracking tools such as JIRA | | |
Integration with Software Verification tools such as HP/ALM, VectorCAST, etc. | | |
Visualization and reporting of traceability of verification tasks to the requirements | | |
Web-based Reviewer |
Full Read-Only Access w/discussions and sign-off
|
Yes. Only after baseline.
|
Requirements Management & Traceability
When it comes to requirements traceability, Visure and Jama are both strong contenders. However, Visure has a few key advantages over Jama in this area.
Firstly, Visure provides more advanced traceability capabilities that allow users to easily track the relationship between requirements and other artifacts throughout the development process. Visure’s traceability matrix allows users to view the traceability relationships between requirements, tests, and defects, making it easier to identify gaps in the traceability matrix and ensure that all requirements are adequately tested and verified.
Secondly, Visure’s traceability features are more customizable compared to Jama, which is important for organizations that have specific traceability requirements. With Visure, users can easily customize the traceability matrix to fit their specific needs, including defining their own traceability relationships and creating custom fields to track additional information.
Lastly, Visure provides more advanced reporting and analysis features for requirements traceability, which is essential for identifying and resolving issues in the traceability process. Visure’s reporting features allow users to easily identify missing or incomplete traceability relationships and generate reports to demonstrate compliance with regulatory standards.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Simulate a change to analyze change impact | |
Suspect links are not reversible in case of simulating a change
|
| Identify changes in requirements when re-importing source file (new, changed, unchanged) | | |
Suspect links identification (flag) | | |
Traceability to The Source Code | | |
Global Parameters | | |
Dynamic Traceability Diagram | | |
Graphical dependencies visualization and control (where used, satisfied by, depending on, responding to, refers to) | |
Not available for documents, only for item types
|
Browsing/searching dependencies (Multi-level "follow up" function) | | |
Queries on dependencies based on criteria | | |
Traceability matrix creation, with links from/to requirements representation (screen and print) in a matrix or tree format | | |
Keep requirements change history (when, why, what and who) |
DA 21 CFR Part 11 compliant
|
Limited information on requirements, risk, test and defect history
|
Requirements versioning | | |
Compare requirements versions | | |
Restore a requirement version | | |
Requirements baseline creation and storage | | |
Version controlling of baseline requirements | | |
Re-import or re-activation of baselines with restored links and requirements versions | | |
Generating reports from previous baselines | | |
Providing read and write protection of baseline products | | |
Baselines comparison | | |
Baseline signature | | |
Powerful Filtering Capabilities |
Multi layered filters
|
Limited
|
Dashboards |
Customizable, Context sensitive
|
Limited
|
Requirements Traceability Matrix |
Instant display, fully customizable
|
Limited
|
Risk Analysis Process
Visure Solutions has several advantages over Jama Software when it comes to risk management. Firstly, Visure offers a powerful risk analysis module that allows users to identify, assess, and mitigate risks associated with their requirements. This module provides advanced risk analysis techniques, such as FMEA, FTA, and HAZOP, which can help users to identify potential failure modes and their causes. Additionally, Visure provides customizable workflows that can be tailored to support different risk analysis scenarios, such as hazard analysis, safety analysis, and risk mitigation planning. This can be particularly useful for organizations operating in highly regulated industries, such as aerospace, automotive, and medical devices. In contrast, Jama’s risk analysis capabilities may not be as robust as Visure’s. While Jama does offer some risk analysis features, they may not provide the same level of advanced functionality as Visure’s. Overall, Visure Solutions is a better choice for organizations looking for a requirements management tool that offers advanced risk analysis capabilities and customizable workflows to support their risk management processes.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Identify risks and trace them to requirements | | |
Import Risks, Mitigations and traceability to requirements | | |
Support FMEA and ASIL | | |
Support customizable calculations of RPN and ASIL based on customer's risk management process | | |
Identify mitigation actions for each risk | | |
Generate custom reports with risk and mitigations | | |
Requirements Reporting & Documentation
Visure Solutions has several advantages over Jama Software when it comes to requirements reporting and documentation. Firstly, Visure offers a powerful reporting engine that allows users to generate customizable reports on a wide range of metrics, such as traceability, coverage, and progress. These reports can be exported in various formats, such as PDF, Word, and Excel, making it easy to share them with stakeholders and team members. Additionally, Visure provides advanced documentation capabilities, such as requirements baselining, change tracking, and audit trails. These features ensure that requirements documentation remains accurate, up-to-date, and compliant with relevant standards and regulations. In contrast, Jama’s reporting and documentation capabilities may not be as robust as Visure’s. While Jama does provide some reporting and documentation features, they may not offer the same level of customization and advanced functionality as Visure. Overall, Visure Solutions is a better choice for organizations looking for a requirements management tool that offers advanced reporting and documentation capabilities to support their requirements management processes.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Export to MS Word and Excel | |
Limited MS Word export capabilities
|
Automatically generate reports and documents such as functional or technical specification, conformity matrices, etc. Based on templates and database live data. | | |
Using flexible user programming language to develop reports for display or generating documents from the tool | | |
Multiple export format for reports | | |
Filters availability and customization for reporting | | |
Requirement Coverge Analysis | |
Limited
|
Requirement Traceability Matrix | | |
Requirement Reusability
When it comes to leveraging requirements for future projects, Visure Solutions offers unbeatable capabilities compared to Jama Software. Firstly, Visure offers a powerful requirements reuse mechanism that allows users to easily reuse requirements across different projects and product lines. This can save time and effort in requirements management, as well as improve consistency and reduce errors. Additionally, Visure provides advanced versioning capabilities, which means that changes made to reused requirements are tracked and managed in a transparent and efficient way. This ensures that reused requirements remain up-to-date and accurate, even as they are used in different contexts. In contrast, Jama’s requirements reuse capabilities may not be as robust as Visure’s. While Jama does allow users to create reusable components, it may not provide the same level of versioning and management capabilities as Visure. Overall, Visure Solutions is a better choice for organizations looking for a requirements management tool that offers advanced requirements reuse capabilities and versioning mechanisms.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Definition of a catalogue of reusable components | | |
Reuse of sets of requirements and traceability | | |
Reuse of requirements in read-only mode | | |
Reuse of requirements in write mode | | |
Reuse two different versions of the same component in two different projects at the same time | | |
Update of components based on changes in original project | | |
Allow selecting a subset of the component to be reuse | | |
Force a full reuse of a component | | |
Branch & Merging | | |
Collaboration
Jama Software is known for its collaboration features, such as real-time commenting, feedback loops, and stakeholder engagement. However, Visure Solutions has some advantages over Jama when it comes to collaboration. Firstly, Visure offers more advanced collaboration features, such as real-time collaboration, social collaboration, and team collaboration. These features enable team members to work together seamlessly and efficiently, which can improve productivity and speed up project delivery. Additionally, Visure provides customizable workflows that can be tailored to support different collaboration scenarios, such as team collaboration, stakeholder collaboration, and customer collaboration. This can be particularly useful for organizations with complex collaboration needs. While Jama does offer some collaboration features, they may not be as advanced as Visure’s. Overall, Visure Solutions is a better choice for organizations looking for a requirements management tool that offers advanced collaboration features and customizable workflows to support their collaboration needs.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Maintaining data integrity under simultaneous multi-user access | | |
Assigning roles to users and groups of users | | |
Assigning role-based access to sets of requirements | | |
Assigning role-based access to attributes of requirements | | |
Maintaining the role-based access schema | | |
Integrations & Synchronization
Visure Solutions has several advantages over Jama Software when it comes to integrations and synchronization. Firstly, Visure offers a wide range of integration options, including JIRA, TFS, HP Quality Center, and IBM DOORS, among others. This means that Visure can easily be integrated into existing toolchains, enabling seamless data exchange between different tools and systems. In contrast, Jama offers fewer integration options, which may limit its ability to integrate with certain systems. Additionally, Visure offers bi-directional synchronization capabilities, which means that updates made in one system are automatically reflected in the other system. This can be particularly useful for organizations with complex toolchains and workflows. Jama also offers synchronization capabilities, but they may not be as advanced as Visure’s. Overall, Visure Solutions is a better choice for organizations looking for a requirements management tool that offers robust integration and synchronization capabilities.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
DOORS integration: Round-trip Requirements capturing and Requirements storage | | |
DOORS migration: Total migration of Requirements, traceability, requirements attributes, requirements baseline, etc. from DOORS to Visure | | |
ReqPro Integration | | |
CaliberRM Integration | | |
HP Quality Center integration | | |
JIRA integration |
Automatic & On-demand
|
On-demand only.
|
Azure DevOps Integrations |
Automatic & On-demand
|
On-demand.
|
Enterprise Architect Integration | | |
VectorCast Testing Tools integration | | |
Your Specific tool integration | |
Only with Expensive 3rd Party Apps or Custom Development.
|
Standard Compliance
Visure Solutions has several advantages over Jama Software when it comes to industry standard compliance. Firstly, Jama does not offer compliance to important standards such as DO-178, DO-254, and CENELEC 50128, whereas Visure provides built-in templates and best practices to support compliance with these standards. Additionally, customization is quite limited in Jama, whereas Visure is highly customizable, allowing users to tailor the software to meet their specific compliance needs. Visure also offers customizable project templates, which are pre-configured to comply with the relevant standard and can save time and effort in compliance efforts. These features can be particularly useful for compliance with industry standards that have specific requirements or guidelines. Overall, Visure Solutions is a better choice for organizations looking for a requirements management tool that supports compliance with important industry standards.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
DO-178B/C & DO-254 | |
Limited. No DO-178/C & DO-254 Standard Checklists
|
IEC 62304 | | |
ISO 26262 | | |
IEC 61508 | | |
CENELEC 50128 | | |
FMEA | | |
SPICE, CMMI | | |
Your Specific Standard, etc. | |
Limited customization
|
Tool Qualification Package | | |
Customizable Project Templates | | |
Infrastructure
Visure Solutions offers several advantages over Jama Software when it comes to infrastructure. Firstly, Visure enables organizations to set up an entire requirements management process from scratch. This includes setting up a system architecture, capturing requirements, and linking associated systems and tasks. Additionally, the tool supports distributed teams and provides features that enable easy communication between team members who are scattered across different locations. Furthermore, Visure also allows users to set up their own test environments for testing purposes and provides automated testing capabilities for fast feedback on changes made in the system. In comparison, Jama does not offer this level of flexibility and scalability when it comes to managing complex projects or interacting with multiple stakeholders. Overall, Visure makes it easier for organizations to build an effective requirements management system and collaborate with stakeholders in different locations.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Commercial database system | | |
Standard backup procedures | | |
Commercial API languages availability |
WEB API, .NET, Python
|
WEB API exclusively
|
Configuration & Customization
Visure Solutions offers more customization options than Jama Software when it comes to configuration and customization. Firstly, Visure allows users to customize the interface based on their individual preferences and needs. This enables users to quickly access relevant information and make changes as needed. Furthermore, Visure also provides comprehensive templates that can be used for configuring different aspects of the system such as workflow rules, notifications, and user permissions. Additionally, Visure allows users to configure data models with custom attributes and conditions, enabling them to store requirements in a format that is tailored specifically to their organization’s needs. In contrast, Jama does not provide this level of flexibility when it comes to configuration and customization. As a result, Visure Solutions is the better choice for organizations that require more advanced customization options.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Private Cloud |
AWS, Azure, Google, or others
|
AWS Only
|
On-Premise | | |
Full Application SDK | | |
Full Plug-in SDK | | |
Pricing
Visure Solutions offers more affordable pricing plans than Jama Software does. With Visure, users can choose from a variety of different pricing tiers depending on the size and complexity of their projects. This makes it easier for organizations to select a plan that fits within their budget. Additionally, Visure also provides discounts on multi-year contracts, which can help reduce costs even further. In comparison, Jama does not offer any discounts or flexible plans, making it more expensive for organizations with complex requirements management needs. As such, Visure is the better choice for companies looking for an affordable yet comprehensive requirements management system.
|
Key Features
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
Price |
$
|
$$$$
|
Free Trial | | |
Pricing Availability |
Upon Request
|
Upon Request
|
On-premise Licenses |
Yes. Easy installation and maintenance.
|
Yes. Dedicated experts required for the installation and maintenance of the infrastructure.
|
Ready Only Licenses | | |
Subscription Licenses | | |
Permanent Licenses | | |
Minimum Licenses Required | |
High entry-level cost.
|
Tool Trainings | | |
Training Cost |
$
|
$$$$
|
Minimum Consulting Days Required |
None
|
Required
|
Support & Maintenance |
$
|
$$$$
|
Value for Money |
5/5
|
2.5/5
|
Annual Price Increase per License |
No regular updates to pricing policy.
|
5% Increase per year
|
Requires Linux Expert Support |
Not necessary.
|
Required.
|
Includes Service Fees | | |
Learn how an All-in-One Requirements ALM Platform can improve the quality of your products and services.
Requirements Management
Test Management
Risk Management
Get Started with Visure Requirements ALM
Try Visure for 30 Days Free. No obligations, no contracts, cancel at any time.
Visure Transforms the way these companies develop complex products & systems
