Visure Solutions

Start Free Trial

Automating Your Proof of Compliance Process for DO-178B/C

Automating Your Proof of Compliance Process for DO-178B/C

Table of Contents


In the world of avionics software development, compliance with the DO-178B/C standard is crucial. DO-178B/C provides guidelines for the development of software used in airborne systems and equipment, ensuring its safety, reliability, and compliance with regulatory requirements. However, the process of demonstrating compliance with DO-178B/C can be complex and time-consuming. To streamline this process and improve efficiency, many organizations are turning to automation. In this article, we will explore the benefits of automating the proof of compliance process for DO-178B/C and discuss how it can help aerospace companies achieve faster and more cost-effective certification.

The Challenges of DO-178B/C Compliance

Before delving into the advantages of automation, it’s important to understand the challenges associated with DO-178B/C compliance. The standard outlines a rigorous set of objectives and activities that must be followed, including requirements management, software design, coding, verification, and documentation. Each of these activities requires extensive documentation and evidence to demonstrate compliance. Traditionally, this has been a manual and error-prone process, leading to significant time and resource investments. Additionally, maintaining traceability between requirements, design, and verification artifacts can be challenging, especially as the complexity of software systems increases.

Benefits of Automating the Proof of Compliance Process

Automating the proof of compliance process offers several significant benefits to aerospace organizations seeking DO-178B/C certification. Let’s explore some of these advantages:

Increased Efficiency and Productivity

Automation eliminates many of the manual and repetitive tasks associated with the proof of compliance process. With automation tools, organizations can streamline activities such as requirements tracing, test case generation, and documentation generation. This increased efficiency leads to faster development cycles and reduces the time and effort required to demonstrate compliance.

Enhanced Accuracy and Consistency

Automation tools provide a higher level of accuracy and consistency compared to manual processes. By reducing the reliance on human intervention, the potential for errors and omissions is significantly minimized. This ensures that compliance artifacts are consistently generated, reducing the risk of non-compliance during audits or certification reviews.

Improved Traceability and Documentation

Maintaining traceability between requirements, design artifacts, and verification activities is a critical aspect of DO-178B/C compliance. Automation tools facilitate the creation and maintenance of traceability matrices, ensuring that all artifacts are linked correctly. This not only helps during the certification process but also enables easier impact analysis and change management throughout the software development lifecycle.

Cost and Time Savings

Automating the proof of compliance process can lead to substantial cost and time savings. By reducing the effort required for manual tasks, organizations can reallocate resources to more value-added activities. Furthermore, automation enables the parallelization of activities, allowing multiple verification tasks to be executed simultaneously. This accelerates the overall development and certification process, resulting in faster time to market and reduced project costs.

Improved Collaboration and Communication

Automation tools provide a centralized platform for collaboration and communication among development teams, certification authorities, and other stakeholders. This facilitates the exchange of information, review cycles, and real-time updates, improving transparency and reducing delays caused by manual coordination efforts.

Implementing Automation in the Proof of Compliance Process

To successfully implement automation in the proof of compliance process for DO-178B/C, organizations should consider the following steps:

  • Evaluate Automation Tools: Research and select automation tools that align with the organization’s specific needs and objectives. Consider factors such as ease of use, integration capabilities, and compliance with industry standards.
  • Define Automation Strategy: Develop a clear strategy outlining how automation will be integrated into the existing compliance process. Identify key areas for automation and establish metrics to measure the effectiveness of automation efforts.
  • Integrate Automation into Workflows: Modify existing workflows to incorporate automation tools seamlessly. Train development teams on how to utilize the automation tools effectively and provide ongoing support and guidance.
  • Establish Traceability and Documentation Processes: Define and implement standardized processes for maintaining traceability between requirements, design artifacts, and verification activities. Ensure that the automation tools support the generation of accurate and comprehensive documentation.
  • Monitor and Optimize: Continuously monitor the effectiveness of automation efforts and make necessary adjustments. Collect feedback from development teams and stakeholders to identify areas for improvement and implement best practices.


Automating the proof of compliance process for DO-178B/C offers numerous benefits to aerospace organizations, including increased efficiency, enhanced accuracy, improved traceability, cost and time savings, and improved collaboration. By embracing automation tools and integrating them into existing workflows, companies can streamline the compliance process, reduce manual efforts, and achieve faster and more cost-effective certification. As the complexity of avionics software continues to grow, automation will play an increasingly critical role in meeting regulatory requirements and ensuring the safety and reliability of airborne systems.

Don’t forget to share this post!


The High Cost of Poor Requirements Management

June 06th, 2024

11 am EST | 5 pm CET | 8 am PST

Louis Arduin

Louis Arduin

Main Speaker

Impact & Solutions for Inefficient Requirements Management

Explore the significant impact that inefficient requirements management practices can have on project costs and timelines.